Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is 2787 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Performs up to 13% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G1610 - 212 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Renoir | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |