Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is 2143 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 541 vs 518 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Renoir | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 135 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
