Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2894 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1620 - 560 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
560
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$269
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |