Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2407 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G1620 - 124 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$36.89 vs CA$315.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$0.32 vs CA$2.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.54/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$315
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
116
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |