Buy on Amazon
CA$549
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $549
Availability
MSRP $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3585 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 55 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 16% better in Fortnite than Celeron G1620 - 246 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 24 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 9 7900X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
246
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$549
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 12-Core, 24-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor, Cooler not Included
Buy for CA$549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 9 7900X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
PCs Using Celeron G1620 or Ryzen 9 7900X
With selected game settings
166 FPS
CA$18.51/FPS
16 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$3,072.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
