Buy on Amazon
CA$465.29
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $249
Availability
MSRP $249
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 19% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G1620 - 264 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
264
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$465.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D 8-Core, 16-Thread Desktop Processor
Buy for CA$465.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
