Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800H outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800H is 2815 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
- Performs up to 16% better in No Man's Sky than FX-6350 - 182 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 5800H
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
| Cezanne | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
