Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2825 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8150 - 167 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$95.63 vs CA$203.9
- Up to 45% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$0.67 vs CA$1.22 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
167
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.22/FPS
55%
Price, CA$
CA$203.9
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$203.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
143
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$95.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$95.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |