Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 41% better in New World than FX-8150 - 138 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$87.12 vs CA$1952.53
- Up to 94% better value when playing New World than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.89 vs CA$14.15 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
138
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$14.15/FPS
6%
Price, CA$
CA$1952.53
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,952.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
98
71%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |