Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 4112 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 45% better in Minecraft than FX-8150 - 868 vs 597 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - CA$95.63 vs CA$278.98
- Up to 50% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen 5 7600 - CA$0.16 vs CA$0.32 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
868
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$278.98
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$278.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
597
69%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$95.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$95.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |