Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 68% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6300 - 399 vs 237 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$104.79 vs CA$203.9
- Up to 14% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$0.44 vs CA$0.51 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
399
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
86%
Price, CA$
CA$203.9
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$203.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
237
59%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$104.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$104.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |