Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 27% better in Resident Evil 4 than FX-6300 - 198 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$66.51 vs CA$316.4
- Up to 73% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.43 vs CA$1.6 per FPS
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
198
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.6/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$316.4
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$316.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10399 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
156
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10390 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |