Buy on Amazon
CA$388
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 480 days newer than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 7 3700U - 428 vs 390 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 20 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
428
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
