Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1591 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 9% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-8300 - 107 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - CA$83.46 vs CA$401.46
- Up to 77% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen 7 1700 - CA$0.85 vs CA$3.75 per FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
107
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.75/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$401.46
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$401.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
98
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |