Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - CA$83.46 vs CA$365.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-11900KF - CA$0.51 vs CA$1.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in God of War than FX-8300 - 188 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
163
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8314 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.94/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$365
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$365 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8314 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |