Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 31% better in Rust than Celeron G3900 - 209 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$42.99 vs CA$899.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$0.27 vs CA$4.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
209
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.3/FPS
6%
Price, CA$
CA$899
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |