Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2135 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4130 - 208 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 34% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - CA$84.99 vs CA$129.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 3600 - CA$0.43 vs CA$0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
208
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
69%
Price, CA$
CA$129
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
198
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |