Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1277 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - CA$161.97 vs CA$479.97
- Up to 57% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-13700F - CA$1.59 vs CA$3.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 27% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 3400G - 130 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 24 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
102
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$161.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$161.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
130
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.69/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$479.97
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$479.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |