Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 39% better in New World than Ryzen 5 2600 - 151 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - CA$142.72 vs CA$458.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing New World than Core i7-13700F - CA$1.31 vs CA$3.04 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
151
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.04/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$458.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$458.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
109
72%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |