Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 475 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EPYC 7302P - 128 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 95 vs 155 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | AMD EPYC 7302P |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | EPYC |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Rome |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 155 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |