Buy on Amazon
CA$239.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1436 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 5 than EPYC 7302P - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 35 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$239.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for CA$239.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rome | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
