Buy on Amazon
CA$262.38
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i7-9700 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 106 days newer than Core i7-9700.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-9700 - 189 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
177
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$262.38
100%
Value Winner
Intel SRG13 Core i7-9700 3.0 GHz Octo-Core Processor
Buy for CA$262.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using EPYC 7302P or Core i7-9700
Assassin's Creed Valhalla, 1920 x 1080, Ultra High
20 FPS
CA$89.7/FPS
GeForce GTX 1050
Core i7-9700
16 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,793.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
