Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1163 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Need For Speed Unbound than EPYC 7302P - 139 vs 136 FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 140 vs 155 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
139
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$248.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |