Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 56 days older than Ryzen 5 2500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 5 2500U - 215 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500U - 16 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
215
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |