Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 2315 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than FX-8150 - 522 vs 504 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |