Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1995 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - CA$141.17 vs CA$678.98
- Up to 75% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-13900KF - CA$0.87 vs CA$3.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 1600X - 195 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 32 vs 12 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
163
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$141.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$141.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.48/FPS
25%
Price, CA$
CA$678.98
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$678.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |