Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 4300U is 2443 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6350 - 171 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 4300U - 6 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 4300U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
| Renoir | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Graphics 320SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
