Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1354 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - CA$265.0 vs CA$860.35
- Up to 64% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900 - CA$1.46 vs CA$4.02 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 3300X - 214 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
181
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$265
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
214
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.02/FPS
36%
Price, CA$
CA$860.35
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$860.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |