Buy on Amazon
CA$863.58
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $219
Availability
MSRP in USD: $219
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 2463 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 17% better in Deathloop than Ryzen 5 1600 - 203 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - CA$250.0 vs CA$863.58
- Up to 66% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-14900 - CA$1.44 vs CA$4.25 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.25/FPS
33%
Price, CA$
CA$863.58
28%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-14900 Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) up to 5.8 GHz
Buy for CA$863.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
174
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 65W AM4 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler (YD1600BBAFBOX)
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
