Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 6 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 5% better in New World than Core i5-10400 - 121 vs 115 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 34% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$174.99 vs CA$265.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing New World than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$1.52 vs CA$2.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
121
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.19/FPS
69%
Price, CA$
CA$265
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11548 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
115
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11548 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |