Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 569 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$180.0 vs CA$1074.19
- Up to 83% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$1.01 vs CA$6.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 3 3100 - 179 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 24 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
178
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$180
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3364 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
179
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6/FPS
16%
Price, CA$
CA$1074.19
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,074.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3364 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |