Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms Ryzen 3 2300U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 587 days older than Ryzen 3 2300U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 3 2300U - 406 vs 384 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2300U - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
406
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$213.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$213.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |