Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1259 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 19% better in War Thunder than FX-8370 - 157 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - CA$220.0 vs CA$294.22
- Up to 11% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 3 2200G - CA$1.67 vs CA$1.87 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
157
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.87/FPS
89%
Price, CA$
CA$294.22
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$294.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
132
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.67/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$220
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |