Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 637 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$220.0 vs CA$248.88
- Up to 5% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-6900K - CA$0.87 vs CA$0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than FX-8370 - 272 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 16 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
253
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$220
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
272
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
94%
Price, CA$
CA$248.88
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |