Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 433 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$87.91 vs CA$1149.12
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 3 1300X - 262 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 24 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$87.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66667 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
262
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66666 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
1097
86.10675039246468%
Multi-Core
3157
42.35309900724443%
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |