Buy on Amazon
CA$649.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10300 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10300 is 1008 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 1200 - 110 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - CA$144.99 vs CA$649.99
- Up to 80% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 1200 - CA$1.32 vs CA$6.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Acer Chromebook Plus 514 Laptop – 14" WUXGA 1920 x 1200 IPS Touch Display | AMD Ryzen 3 7320C | 8GB LPDDR5X | 128GB eMMC | Wi-Fi 6E | FHD Facial Auto Exposure Camera | Chrome OS | CB514-3HT-R8RB
Buy for CA$649.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
110
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$144.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10300 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$144.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
