Buy on Amazon
CA$32.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 1712 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield V than Phenom X4 9550 - 205 vs 200 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 55 vs 95 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
57.21271393643031%
Multi-Core
712
98.47856154910097%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
