Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 1902 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 95 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 7% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom X4 9550 - 110 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
110
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.09/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$340
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 232 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
43.01470588235294%
Multi-Core
712
32.79594656840166%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | FX |
Agena | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 220 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |