Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 3302 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Phenom X4 9550 - 199 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$270.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$270.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
21.910112359550563%
Multi-Core
712
15.552643075578857%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Agena | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |