Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 3135 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Phenom II X4 810 - 158 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 24 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.8/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Deneb | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |