Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 3863 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - CA$340.0 vs CA$860.35
- Up to 46% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i9-14900 - CA$1.64 vs CA$3.05 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 36% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-9590 - 282 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
207
73%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$340
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
282
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.05/FPS
53%
Price, CA$
CA$860.35
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$860.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
220 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |