Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3494 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$340.0 vs CA$1827.7
- Up to 76% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-13400F - CA$2.22 vs CA$9.37 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 29% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-9590 - 197 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
153
77.66497461928934%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$340
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.37/FPS
23.692636072572043%
Price, CA$
CA$1827.7
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,827.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
220 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |