Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105 outperforms the more expensive FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2387 days newer than the more expensive FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 28% better in Rust than FX-8370 - 199 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than FX-8370 - CA$145.99 vs CA$480.74
- Up to 76% better value when playing Rust than FX-8370 - CA$0.73 vs CA$3.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
156
78.39195979899498%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.08/FPS
23.7012987012987%
Price, CA$
CA$480.74
30%
Buy for CA$480.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$145.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$145.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |