Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - CA$134.65 vs CA$339.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13400 - CA$1.01 vs CA$2.3 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10105 - 148 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
133
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$134.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$134.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.3/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$339.99
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$339.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |