Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 1261 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Phenom II X4 925 - 157 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
157
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$111.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
69.71677559912854%
Multi-Core
930
51.12699285321606%
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2009 |
FX | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Vishera | Codename | Deneb |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |