Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1783 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$83.46 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 86% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-7920X - CA$0.33 vs CA$2.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-8300 - 256 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
250
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3240 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
256
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.35/FPS
14%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3243 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |