Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$83.46 vs CA$400.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-10900KF - CA$0.14 vs CA$0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 25% better in Minecraft than FX-8300 - 746 vs 599 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 20 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
599
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12179 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
746
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
25%
Price, CA$
CA$400
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |