Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2929 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - CA$93.19 vs CA$452.99
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-8150 - 170 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 20 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75496 minutes ago
Buy for CA$452.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75497 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Zambezi | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |