Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2129 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Valorant than FX-8120 - 751 vs 681 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 24 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
751
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$280.74
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$280.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75389 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Zambezi | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |