Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 981 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - CA$59.57 vs CA$251.07
- Up to 74% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-6700 - CA$0.32 vs CA$1.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 9% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-6300 - 205 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
188
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.22/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$251.07
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$251.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |